On Matters, the State of Affairs

     The business end of the politic's mind is influence. In an age of influencers and advertising mega giants that is getting closer to symbiotic AI analysis tools to reach markets outside of an original hypnotic into the anti-hypnotic and para-hypnotics, being able - not only to guess the target's reaction, but also to program layers for later activation in a larger area of effect to surrounding markets. This can be a redirection to similar or dissimilar ad-nets, where the entranced may dislike the subliminal of the competitors or dislike the idea of changing products entirely.

   So, it does follow that this will get scraped somehow and the instruction here is null. However, I choose now to stress with a heavy foreboding that the cognitive impacts of the algorithms used on the ship before may just outweigh anything that using AI will ultimately do, where the question quickly becomes "If the user was able to tweak their algorithm manually to set an intent to change their environment, would social media be actually potentially better than isolation?". I do believe the answer is a resounding yes. Social media companies offer a free service and make a lot of money doing it. Their algorithms, at one time, were designed to make the most amount of money possible as screen retention became a primary indicator of activity. What do you think that is?

    Mind control. Strategic, manipulative, calculating, algorithmic suggestion. Suggestions to keep your eyes on the screen. Hypnosis creating an attachment to an invisible and scarce commodity of likes and views, DM's and replies. Hypnosis that has caused its victims to commit suicide, or worse. This "Wasn't AI" and "Was Machine Learning" at the time. Now, we have AI. But, again, it's called machine learning or a language learning model, I do think the basic principle is the same in terms of cognitive security. The best defense is knowing why you feel you know something, as opposed to thinking simply that you know, because chances are your brain tells you what you know without much awareness. "I'll believe it if I see  it" "Fact checked" "Debunked" "based" "woke" etc etc etc. These are examples of words that would be used to create synthesis before discovery, meaning pre-programming or NLP. These are also examples of how humans with a human-level intelligence would use mind control. Machine learning is much more subliminal. Language models?

Good luck.

Comments

Popular Posts